Looking back at your preliminary task (the school magazine task), what do you feel you have learnt in the progression from it to full product?




Since the preliminary task I have learnt a lot of things. Mainly, I have learnt the importance of the image and layout on the magazine. My image on the prelim was poor, with the models not even facing the camera. This is not particularly good as the subject should be making eye-contact, but is a little less important on a school magazine as they can be 'ingrossed in their work.' Also house style very important, which I was a lot stronger on in my music magazine, as the title, page layout, colour scheme etc was all the same, whereas on the preliminary task I only had the same title and text colours. Also, research is a crucial element, so as I did not need to do much for the preliminary task as school magazines are not bought or need to fit tastes, I had to allow time for this in my main task. Although there are a differences in my two magazines, I have kept some factors the same. For example, both have a very simple format and some items, such as the date or page numbers are in roughly the same place on both. I also used a white background in both as I think this creates a effective canvas on which to begin.
When I first began my preliminary task, I was unaware of quite how long it takes to assemble the different elements. I also did not know how long it took to get an effective and professional looking picture. Because of this, although I had planned my time well and would have had my pictures ready very early on, due to not knowing this, another 3 sets had to be taken before I was happy, effecting the time I had left. When I began my preliminary task, I didn't really plan my photos, I just took different things that I saw. However, for my music magazine I needed to. I had thought of using props, such as headphones or a mic, but decided that often in music magazines you can't actually tell the person is musical, as they have no or little equipment. This also made the taking of my photographs easier, as I did not need to carry any items with me that may have affected the area in which I wanted to work.
I have included a lot more in my music magazine. There are more articles, more effects and of course there is the additional double page spread. I had to adjust my writing style as in a school magazine it can be a lot more condescending, whereas a music magazine is very chatty and much older. My music magazine also had to appeal to tastes as it is purchased whereas the school magazine would be handed out. I found this hard to make appealing to my audience, as i explained earlier, as it was so broad.
Feedback is also very important. On the preliminary tasks I didn't bother asking people for their opinions as it wasn't intended to particularly appeal to anyone. However, on my mu
sic magazine I asked for feedback on everything from the name to my final front cover. It is amazing how the smallest contribution from someone can make such a drastic difference to your piece. For example, a friend told me that they thought my model was a little unsuitable for my magazine, so i replaced them and my magazine went from having a male model to a female one.
The main problems I faced over this time period was time management and the programs. I found it hard to reach some of the deadlines due to the fact that I just wasn't happy with my work. This meant I had to put extra hours in to get it done but still not always on time. This was mainly down to my 'trial and error' approach. More often that not, it worked first or second time, but occasionally it took a very long time until I was happy. When it came to programs, for my front cover and contents on both of my magazines, I used photoshop, only using InDesign for my double page spread. This was very hard to adjust to.
Overall, I feel I have learnt so much over this course. I have learnt to apply myself on different programs and machines and easily switch between them. I think that my preliminary task is pretty poor and that my music magazine makes it look even worse as it is so much better. I am pleased with my outcome and confident that if I were to do it again, it would be even better.




















My images took me a while to acquire as I was unhappy with my first few photo shoots. This was due to various factors such as the lighting and outfit worn etc. However, i am pleased with the image I ended up with as it is clear, well lighted and looks professional. It also is similar to some I have found. Looking at the mise-en-scene, neither have any props in particular, although the actual magazine she has a throw over her shoulder. I cut my image from it's original backgroun and blurred it's edges to make it white. This both magazines have in common. Most music magazines fit this convention of a black or cut out background as it draws more attention to the artist. Also, the women are part of the mise-en-scene. Often the person on the front of a magazine is attractive and in some form of alluring pose, which I feel that I have acheived. Both women are framing their body in some way even if it is not the same. Their heads are not facing straight ahead but are at some angle although they are both making eye contact with the camera. Neither has their whole body in shot and they are both wearing dark colours. The make up that the artist wears is very important which is why I made her eyes dark and seductive with bright lipstick. The lighting I used was natural as the artificial lighting I had used before was unsuccessful. I feel that this added a more clean, clear look about her.













